Dear Daniel: My first try with ektar. Forgot my light meter so moved everyone into shade and used flash to expose kids.
Worked ok colors are great but sharpness is not perfect....maybe I moved?(hand held) Or scanned ektar is different than ektachrome?
the file I received is 17Kx13K, 47MB, way too big for this blog, I managed to reduce the size, but cropped a handsome boy as original size, so you can appreciate the quality of the image.
Way to go! John, thanks for sharing this wonderful shot!
Thanks Ralf, he tested the Byron and sent me his image link, it is beautiful, thanks for sharing!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8073875@N02/8450183305/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8073875@N02/8440208775/in/photostream/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8073875@N02/8424044231/in/photostream/
Shot on Fomapan 100, Byron with Ysarex 127/4.7
2012/12/09 add
"a little harsh....camera top flash....with another one hidden for the background. Night before the start of deer hunting season.---Tmax 400 4x5 in Byron"
John took some pictures in his dacha with Byron and sent them to me, love it! so I share them with you. They were in Fuji 4x5 color negatives, lens is 127/4.7 Ysarex Rodenstock, original lens from Polaroid 110A/B camera.
John wrote to me " I took it on a really flimsy tripod...and forgot my cable release....but had one of those self timers that thread into the lens. I set it to bulb and counted to 5 and covered the lens with a black cloth!!"
Original images John scanned are big on pixels, they are about 8 million pixels per image, so I downsized them, but kept part of image in original size, so you can see how detail the lens captured.